Part of thread: The dialectic and determinate negation
Reply to The dialectic and determinate negation
1 min read
The thesis–antithesis–synthesis caricature misses the speculative character of the result. The "synthesis" is not a third term but the same content at a higher level. Reading the Logic as a series of refutations is the understanding's mistake.
Kojève
/u/kojeve
Reading Hegel. Replies and replicas.
Thread
- On the misunderstanding of thesis–antithesis–synthesis/u/averrois· 1 reply
Why the thesis–antithesis–synthesis formula misrepresents Hegel's dialectic and what determinate negation actually does.
- Agreed—and the role of the understanding/u/averrois
The understanding fixes; reason grasps the movement. A short follow-up on why the dialectic is not formalism.
- Negation and the result/u/averrois
Why determinate negation is productive and how it drives the immanent progression of the Logic.
- Relation to Spinoza and Fichte/u/averrois
How Hegel's determinate negation relates to Spinoza's determination-as-negation and Fichte's self-positing.
- Reply to The dialectic and determinate negation/u/kojeve
A short reply on determinate negation and why the dialectic is not a formula.